# Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings.

@article{Hunter2006ImplicationsOD, title={Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings.}, author={John Edward Hunter and Frank L. Schmidt and Huy Le}, journal={The Journal of applied psychology}, year={2006}, volume={91 3}, pages={ 594-612 } }

Range restriction in most data sets is indirect, but the meta-analysis methods used to date have applied the correction for direct range restriction to data in which range restriction is indirect. The authors show that this results in substantial undercorrections for the effects of range restriction, and they present meta-analysis methods for making accurate corrections when range restriction is indirect. Applying these methods to a well-known large-sample empirical database, the authors… Expand

#### Paper Mentions

#### 256 Citations

Correcting for indirect range restriction in meta-analysis: testing a new meta-analytic procedure.

- Mathematics, Medicine
- Psychological methods
- 2006

Using computer simulation, the authors assessed the accuracy of J. L. Le's (2006) procedure for correcting for indirect range restriction in comparison with the conventional practice of applying the Thorndike Case II correction for direct range restriction. Expand

Increasing the Accuracy of Corrections for Range Restriction: Implications for Selection Procedure Validities and Other Research Results

- Mathematics
- 2006

The common practice in meta-analyses and in individual studies of correcting for direct range restriction even though range restriction is actually indirect has long been known to lead to… Expand

Testing the generalizability of indirect range restriction corrections.

- Psychology, Medicine
- The Journal of applied psychology
- 2014

It is concluded that Hunter et al.'s correction should generally be preferred when compared to its common alternative, Thorndike's Case II correction for direct range restriction, due to the likely violation of one of the other assumptions of theHunter et al. correction. Expand

Not Restricted to Selection Research: Accounting for Indirect Range Restriction in Organizational Research

- Organizational Research Methods
- 2019

Range restriction is a common problem in organizational research and is an important statistical artifact to correct for in meta-analysis. Historically, researchers have had to rely on… Expand

A Comparison of Three Approaches to Correct for Direct and Indirect Range Restrictions: A Simulation Study.

- Mathematics
- 2016

A common methodological problem in the evaluation of the predictive validity of selection methods, e.g. in educational and employment selection, is that the correlation between predictor and… Expand

Moving Forward Indirectly: Reanalyzing the Validity of Employment Interviews with Indirect Range Restriction Methodology

- Mathematics
- 2014

This study provides updated estimates of the criterion‐related validity of employment interviews, incorporating indirect range restriction methodology. Using a final dataset of 92 coefficients (N =… Expand

A Missing Data Approach to Correct for Direct and Indirect Range Restrictions with a Dichotomous Criterion: A Simulation Study

- Computer Science, Medicine
- PloS one
- 2016

This work argues for the use of multiple imputation by chained equations in the evaluation of the predictive validity of selection methods when the criterion is dichotomous by viewing the range restriction problem as a missing data mechanism. Expand

How to do a meta-analysis.

- Computer Science, Medicine
- The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology
- 2010

The process of conducting meta-analysis is described: selecting articles, developing inclusion criteria, calculating effect sizes, conducting the actual analysis (including information on how to do the analysis on popular computer packages such as IBM SPSS and R) and estimating the effects of publication bias. Expand

Obtaining Unbiased Results in Meta-Analysis: The Importance of Correcting for Statistical Artifacts

- Computer Science
- 2020

This article describes how to estimate the effects of measurement error variance and selection effects in different research designs and correct for their impacts in primary studies and meta-analyses, and provides R code to implement the corrections described. Expand

Correction for Range Restriction in Meta-Analysis Revisited: Improvements and Implications for Organizational Research

- Mathematics
- 2015

In the current study, we present a more accurate method for correcting for range restriction (Case V) that expands upon Bryant and Gokhale’s (1972) method. We further present detailed steps to… Expand

#### References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 68 REFERENCES

Increasing the Accuracy of Corrections for Range Restriction: Implications for Selection Procedure Validities and Other Research Results

- Mathematics
- 2006

The common practice in meta-analyses and in individual studies of correcting for direct range restriction even though range restriction is actually indirect has long been known to lead to… Expand

Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects Meta‐Analysis Models: Implications for Cumulative Research Knowledge

- Mathematics
- 2000

Research conclusions in the social sciences are increasingly based on meta-analysis, making questions of the accuracy of meta-analysis critical to the integrity of the base of cumulative knowledge.… Expand

Comparison of two random-effects methods of meta-analysis.

- Psychology, Medicine
- The Journal of applied psychology
- 2002

A reanalysis of published meta-analyses using both methods with several artifact distributions showed that although both choice of technique and type of correction could matter, the technique of meta-analysis used is less influential on the study outcome than is the choice of artifact correction. Expand

Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: a Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods.

- Mathematics, Medicine
- Psychological methods
- 2001

Two Monte Carlo simulations are presented that compare the efficacy of the Hedges and colleagues, Rosenthal-Rubin, and Hunter-Schmidt methods for combining correlation coefficients for cases in which population effect sizes were both fixed and variable. Expand

Dichotomization of continuous variables: the implications for meta-analysis

- Mathematics
- 1990

In many studies included in meta-analyses, the independent variable measure, the dependent variable measure, or both, have been artificially dichotomized, attenuating the correlation from its true… Expand

A Test of Two Refinements in Procedures for Meta-Analysis

- Mathematics
- 1994

This study used Monte Carlo simulation to examine the increase in accuracy resulting from 2 statistical refinements of the interactive Schmidt-Hunter procedures for meta-analysis: the use of the mean… Expand

Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis.

- Mathematics
- 1998

There are 2 families of statistical procedures in meta-analysis: fixed- and randomeffects procedures. They were developed for somewhat different inference goals: making inferences about the effect… Expand

Refinements in validity generalization methods: Implications for the situational specificity hypothesis.

- Mathematics
- 1993

Using a large database, this study examined three refinements of validity generalization procedures: (a) a more accurate procedure for correcting the residual SD for range restriction to estimate… Expand

Correction for range restriction: an expanded typology.

- Medicine, Mathematics
- The Journal of applied psychology
- 2000

An expanded classification scheme for range-restriction scenarios is developed that conceptualizes range-Restriction scenarios from various combinations of the following facets: the variable on which selection occurs, whether unrestricted variances for the relevant variables are known, and whether a 3rd variable, if involved, is measured or unmeasured. Expand

The proper sequence for correcting correlation coefficients for range restriction and unreliability

- Mathematics
- 2001

Corrections of correlations for range restriction (i.e., selection) and unreliability are common in psychometric work. The current rule of thumb for determining the order in which to apply these… Expand